If freedom of speech is absolute, how come it's not applied...

Child pornography

Threats of violence

And much, much more.

How will the article end in Part III of Gleissner's hit piece?

No freedom is absolute.

That’s what it is. You have no right to use other people’s stuff. If people let you use their stuff, they can tell you how you can use it, and they can tell you to stop using it any time they want.

You have freedom of speech. If I loan you my computer, I can tell you not to use it for certain things, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

How does Arab culture and values differ from western culture and values?

Perjury

Conspiracy

You have freedom to travel. If I loan you my car, I can tell you not to take it out of town, because it’s mine, you have no right to use it, and if I give you permission to use it I can tell you what you can and can’t do with it.

Why do people mourn when their leaders lose elections? Is it common for people to cry over events that are out of their control?

False advertising

Terroristic threats

Insider trading

Is love natural, or is it somehow created?

Fraud

Insurrection

Revealing classified information

Did you ever accidentally have sex with your brother/sister in India?

If you’re wondering why free speech doesn’t apply to the internet, it’s because you have no right to use other people’s stuff for free.

Freedom of speech does not apply to:

Revenge porn